|HOME | ATTORNEYS | DIRECTIONS | CONTACT US ||
McGunagle, Reidy & Hentz, Ltd.
2088 Broad Street, Cranston, RI 02905-3342
PH: 401.941.2088 - FAX: 401.941.0017
A Business Lawyer In New Orlean Business Law And Operation Tips Business Law Attorneys Business Law and Commercial Solicitors Business Law and Law Firm Business Laws Basics Business Laws For Small Businesses Business Laws Unveiled Business Litigation Commercial Law Payment Commercial Loan Modification Success Tips Commercial Refinancing Commercial Transactions Gone Bad Commercial Transactions Money Laundering Company Law Services Company and Business Laws Differences Between Family Solicitors Direct Commercial Funding Review Employment Law Florida Real Estate Lawyers History Of Business Law Degree How Can Attorney Help You How To Choose LLM Business How To Finance YourBusiness How To Get Investment Money How to Make Commercial Transactions Immigration and Business Law Important Facts About Commercial Mortgages Important Points to Know Intercompany Business Transactions And Relationships International Commercial Arbitration - Law Late payments in commercial transactions Laws Surrounding Online Pharmacy Business Legal For Trade Scale Managing Business Law Ntep Scale Assurance Of Quality Role of Commercial Law Firms Salespeople Must Understand the Fundamental Principles Small Business Law and Their Issues Specialists Navigating the Legal Minefields Startup Law 101 The Best Business Law Books The Law Of Attraction The Necessity of Business Law Things You Should Consider Listing US Commercial Mortgage Basics Finance Using Your Slow Paying Invoices Walker Commercial Fundings Experience What Commercial Law Deals With What Constitutes A Breach Of Contract What Is Business Law What Is the Checklist What You Need To Know About Business What You Need to Know Where to Go For Training Why to Have a Trusted Probate Work With The Best Real Estate
Commercial Law - Payment of Commission - Commercial Agency Regulations - Commercial Agent
The case of Heirs of Paul Chevassus-Marche v Groupe Danone and Others (Case C-19/07) , involved a determination on community laws relating to commercial agents. According to Article 7(2) of Council Directive (EEC) 86/653 (On the coordination of the laws of the member states relating to self-employed commercial agents) ("the Directive"):
"A commercial agent shall also be entitled to commission on transactions concluded during the period covered by the agency contract either where he was entrusted with a specific geographical area or group of customers... And where the transaction has been entered into with a customer belonging to that area or group...".
Article 10 provides as follows:
"(1) The commission shall become due as soon as and to the extent that one of the following circumstances obtains:
(a) the principal has executed the transaction; or the principal should, according to his agreement with the third party, have executed the transaction; or...
(c) the third party has executed the transaction.
(2) The commission shall become due at the latest when the third party has executed his part of the transaction or should have done so if the principal had executed his part of the transaction, as he should have".
In 1987, the first respondent in this case concluded an exclusive mandate with C. The applicants in this case were heirs to C's estate. The exclusive mandate concerned the first respondent's representation of C's subsidiaries, namely the second and third respondents, in their dealings with the importers, wholesalers and retailers of their goods in a specific geographical area.
Before the termination of that contract, C requested payment of various sums. Such sums included commissions relating to purchases made by two companies established in his geographical area.
The requests for payment were refused on the ground that the purchases concerned had been made from central buying officers or dealers in metropolitan France, an area outside the control of the respondents, and without any action on C's part.
C then brought an action concerning payment of commission.
The national court made a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The question concerned a request for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 7(2) of the Directive. The question referred by the national court was as to whether Article 7(2) of the directive was to be interpreted as meaning that:
"A commercial agent entrusted with a specific geographical area was entitled to commission where a commercial transaction between a third party and a customer belonging to that area had been concluded without any action, either direct or indirect, on the principal's part".
It was held as follows:
The court was of the opinion that
· Article 7(2) of the Directive had to be interpreted as meaning that a commercial agent entrusted with a specific geographical area did not have the right to a commission for transactions concluded by customers belonging to that area without any action, direct or indirect, on the part of the principal.
· Article 7(2) merely refers to any transactions concluded during the period covered by the agency contract. There is no requirement that those transactions had to be entered into with a customer belonging to a geographical area or a group of customers for whom the commercial agent was responsible.
McGunagle, Reidy & Hentz, Ltd.
2088 Broad Street
Cranston, RI 02905
401-941-2088 | Fax 401-941-0017